Academic Misrepresentation and the Public Offices Election Act (Japan)
Academic Misrepresentation and the Public Offices Election Act (Japan)
Relevant Provision
-
Article 235(1): “False Statement Offense”
If a candidate (or their associates) makes a false statement about career history or other matters for the purpose of winning an election, it constitutes a crime.
→ Penalty: Imprisonment of up to 2 years or a fine of up to 300,000 yen. The election result can also be invalidated.
Precedent: The Shinma Seiji Academic Fraud Case (1992 Upper House Election)
-
A candidate falsely claimed to have studied abroad in the U.S. and graduated from a university.
-
The case went up to the Supreme Court, which ruled that “false academic or career credentials that could influence voters’ judgment are illegal.”
-
The candidate was found guilty, setting a clear precedent that misrepresentation of academic background can violate the law.
Current Case (Ito City Mayor, Maki Takubo)
-
In her election documents, she claimed “Graduated from Toyo University, Faculty of Law”, but it was later revealed she had actually been expelled.
-
The city council and some citizens have filed a criminal complaint, citing Article 235.
-
Takubo denies intentional wrongdoing, arguing she “believed she had graduated.” However, following past precedent, the central question is whether she knowingly made a false statement to win the election.
Conclusion
-
Yes, academic misrepresentation can fall under Article 235 of the Public Offices Election Act.
-
There is clear precedent where false academic or career claims led to a conviction.
-
In the current Ito case, whether the law applies depends on proving the intent to deceive for electoral gain.
Comments
Post a Comment