Academic Misrepresentation and the Public Offices Election Act (Japan)
Academic Misrepresentation and the Public Offices Election Act (Japan)
Relevant Provision
- 
Article 235(1): “False Statement Offense”
If a candidate (or their associates) makes a false statement about career history or other matters for the purpose of winning an election, it constitutes a crime.
→ Penalty: Imprisonment of up to 2 years or a fine of up to 300,000 yen. The election result can also be invalidated. 
Precedent: The Shinma Seiji Academic Fraud Case (1992 Upper House Election)
- 
A candidate falsely claimed to have studied abroad in the U.S. and graduated from a university.
 - 
The case went up to the Supreme Court, which ruled that “false academic or career credentials that could influence voters’ judgment are illegal.”
 - 
The candidate was found guilty, setting a clear precedent that misrepresentation of academic background can violate the law.
 
Current Case (Ito City Mayor, Maki Takubo)
- 
In her election documents, she claimed “Graduated from Toyo University, Faculty of Law”, but it was later revealed she had actually been expelled.
 - 
The city council and some citizens have filed a criminal complaint, citing Article 235.
 - 
Takubo denies intentional wrongdoing, arguing she “believed she had graduated.” However, following past precedent, the central question is whether she knowingly made a false statement to win the election.
 
Conclusion
- 
Yes, academic misrepresentation can fall under Article 235 of the Public Offices Election Act.
 - 
There is clear precedent where false academic or career claims led to a conviction.
 - 
In the current Ito case, whether the law applies depends on proving the intent to deceive for electoral gain.
 
Comments
Post a Comment