Fantasy Political Science: The Lord of the Rings / Narnia / Earthsea
Fantasy Political Science: Comparing The Lord of the Rings, The Chronicles of Narnia, and Earthsea
Three lenses: the nature of power, legitimacy, and institutional design.
Key takeaways (one-liners)
- The Lord of the Rings: Power is temptation — authority readily corrupts; rulers must practice restraint and legitimate succession (monarchy + local self-rule).
- Narnia: Sovereignty is grace — legitimacy is conferred by transcendent authority (Aslan) → a theocratic monarchy.
- Earthsea: Governance is balance — true names bind knowledge to responsibility (decentralization + governance by knowledge, later reforms).
Comparison matrix (3 political lenses × major topics)
Aspect | The Lord of the Rings (Tolkien) | The Chronicles of Narnia (Lewis) | Earthsea (Le Guin) |
---|---|---|---|
Nature of power | Temptation and corruption (the Ring); virtue in renouncing power. | Grace and vocation (Aslan’s will). | Equilibrium; an ethics of names (true names and speech). |
Legitimacy | Lineage + virtue (Aragorn); kingship restored after Stewardship. | Theological legitimacy (sanction by Aslan). | Consent + responsibility of knowledge (Roke Island); restoration of kingship subordinated to balance. |
Institutional design | Monarchy plus a league of city-states, with strong local self-government (the Shire as a minimal state). | Theocratic monarchy (child kings/queens); moral order functions as a higher law. | Decentralized archipelagic order; the School at Roke as gatekeeper of knowledge; later gender reforms. |
View of war | Just-war, reluctant grand cause (against Sauron). | Holy-war inflection; salvation-history framing. | Warfare constrained to the restoration of balance. |
Religion | Implicit (providence/grace in the background). | Explicit Christian allegory. | Animist/Taoist-inflected balance. |
Class & status | Affirmative recalibration of rank among monarchs/nobles/commoners. | Monarchy depicted as benevolent; portrayal of Calormenes shows Orientalist tendencies. | Assumes folk diversity; self-critique of a central “rule of knowledge” (Roke). |
Representation of the Other | Mordor as totalitarianism; problematic treatment of Orcs. | Bias in Calormene portrayal debated. | Brown-skinned protagonist; perspective shifts from periphery to center. |
Governance technology | The Ring as a power technology (its use corrodes the user). | The Word/Decrees as higher law. | True names as access/control rights. |
Leader model | Self-mastery, temperance, rightful succession (Aragorn); Gandalf as guardian. | Faith, obedience, moral sensitivity (the Pevensies). | A self-reflective mage (Ged); emphasis on learning and repair. |
Arc of change | Restoration of kingship + Scouring of the Shire (leaderless local autonomy). | Renewal by visitors → system reset with the return of the divine. | Reform of a male-centered magical order from within (from Tehanu onward). |
Economy & land | Stewardship and restraint in development. | Grace-driven prosperity; morality regulates the economy. | Small-scale subsistence islands; resources ≈ words/spells. |
Freedom & destiny | Freedom as the refusal of temptation. | Freedom as alignment with divine will. | To know a name is to bear responsibility — the condition of freedom. |
Reading cues (political-science problem settings)
- Sources of legitimacy: lineage × virtue (Tolkien) / divine will (Lewis) / a “knowledge contract” (Le Guin). Re-read via Weber’s types of authority (traditional/charismatic).
- Power technologies: the Ring as centralizing device; Narnia’s higher law as constraint; true names as protocol/access rights (Foucault/Bourdieu: knowledge as a resource of rule).
- Institutions & scale: central kingship + local autonomy vs. theocratic shortcut vs. critical redesign of school/king in late Earthsea.
- Othering & empire: Orientalism debates in Narnia; Earthsea’s decentering through skin color and women’s voices; Tolkien’s tension between anti-domination and rank aesthetics.
- Ecology & governance: stewardship and restraint (Tolkien); moral order heals nature (Lewis); balance as the shared principle of society and ecology (Le Guin).
One-slide diagram (wireframe)
- Top row labels: Power as Temptation Sovereignty as Grace Governance as Balance
- Middle row: legitimacy (bloodline/divine will/knowledge), institutions (monarchy/theocracy/decentralization), technologies (Ring/Decrees/True Names) connected by arrows.
- Bottom row notes: critiques (Orientalism / gender / local autonomy) as callouts.
Comments
Post a Comment